Quotations often describe different products even when the names look the same. Differences can come from starting hair, processing, length, net weight, end fullness, colour, construction, attachment dimensions, packaging, MOQ and delivery terms.
Quotations should only be compared after these variables are normalised in one table.
| Comparison item | What to record | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Product identity | Construction and supplier product code | Similar names can describe different products |
| Length and profile | Nominal length and usable-length method | Length labels alone may not describe the same fibre profile |
| Net usable hair weight | Hair weight excluding packaging and attachment components where possible | Unit price can appear lower when less usable hair is supplied |
| Material terminology | Supplier's definition of Remy, Virgin, Raw, cuticle or drawn profile | Marketing terms are not interchangeable specifications |
| Construction | Seam, tape, bond, tip, clip, dimensions and pack configuration | Manufacturing input and intended use differ |
| Colour processing | Solid, blonde, rooted, blend or dimensional requirement | Processing scope can differ even when colour names look similar |
| Packaging | Labels, cards, bags, boxes and units per pack | Presentation and labour may be included or excluded |
| Commercial terms | MOQ, sample cost, lead-time basis, payment, freight and Incoterm | Quoted totals may use different responsibilities |
| RFQ version | Dated requirement version quoted by the supplier | Prevents comparison against an older specification |

